Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1530MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB +2228%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
1290 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy