Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
9208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe +135726%
31.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
72
8
Shading Units
9216
4
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA102
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy