Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +15347%
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK110B
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy