Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +72900%
16.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
NVS Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
DG2-512
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy