Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 68W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +6156%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM107
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
68W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy