Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q +9852%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
NVS Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK104
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy