Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 28W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP +91%
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Dec 2009
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
2
8
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

12W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GT218
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy