Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +9060%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
1344
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK104
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy