Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
10232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 +148160%
34.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
80
8
Shading Units
10240
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA102
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy