Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
6136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +266508%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
6144
4
TMUs
384
4
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Navi 31
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy