Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
7416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +81247%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
58
8
Shading Units
7424
4
TMUs
232
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA103
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
22 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy