Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +46030%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2016
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
56
8
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GP100
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy