Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075 +2604%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
30
8
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GT200B
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy