Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +58204%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Sep 2019
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1275 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
72
8
Shading Units
4608
4
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
TU102
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy