CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+58204%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
VS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Sep 2019
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1275 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
4608
4
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
TU102
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Board Design
12W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
3
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
4
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
5
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
7
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID K340
8
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA L40G
9
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy