Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800 +1493%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
108W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy