Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 68W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +4862%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy