CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+47796%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
VS
GRID A100A
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro NVS
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
6912
8
TMUs
432
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Board Design
21W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
2
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
3
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
4
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
5
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
6
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
7
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
8
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
9
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
10
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy