Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +47796%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro NVS
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
6912
8
TMUs
432
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy