Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (21W vs 171W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition +1172%
0.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
128
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

21W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
G80
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.0
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy