Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M +241%
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
32
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy