Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 35W)
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M +1024%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy