Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.13GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M +2548%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
576
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy