Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +24448%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
36
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy