Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M +5468%
1.615 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
1344
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy