Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +46141%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Sep 2019
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1275 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
72
16
Shading Units
4608
8
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
TU102
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy