Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
10224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 +117486%
34.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
80
16
Shading Units
10240
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy