Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090 +4493%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

21W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy