Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (23W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M +1576%
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
128
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

23W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy