Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D +3390%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
51W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy