Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 68W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +6752%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy