Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
3064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB +32490%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM200
-
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Board Design

23W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy