Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
6136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +52566%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro NVS
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
6144
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

23W
TDP
350W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy