Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090 +6242%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
16
8
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy