NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2495MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 295W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
+643%
61.32 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1855 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
6144
Shading Units
2560
384
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
96
RT Cores
20
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
295W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
GA107S
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
529 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
