Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1480MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m +166%
5.046 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P1000
32
Tesla K40m +112%
68
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
2880
40
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK110B
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

47W
TDP
245W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy