Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1291MHz vs 1260MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +529%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
58
1152
Shading Units
7424
72
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy