NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1950MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+31%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
96bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
DG2-128
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
