Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +556%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GT200B
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy