Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1480MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +366%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
160bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
80
1024
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
40
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GV100
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy