Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile +573%
3.11 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
24
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GT200B
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy