Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1404MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q +41%
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P3200 Max Q
87
Quadro K5200 +236%
293
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
2304
112
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy