Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1831MHz vs 1543MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile +35%
7.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1831 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
224GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.9 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.2 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.669 TFLOPS
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.5 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy