Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P520 Mobile +251%
1.147 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1303 MHz
Base Clock
-
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
35.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
17.92 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1147 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
35.83 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy