Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q +2768%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
112
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy