Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1620MHz vs 1098MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 Mobile
1.244 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +12%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1430 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
38.88 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
19.44 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
38.88 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy