Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +1378%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GM107
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy