Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +1128%
12.63 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
3840
Shading Units
448
240
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
238W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GF100
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy