Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +482%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
1536
240
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
122W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GK104
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy