Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1645MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +43451%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
16
240
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
G86
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
21W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy