Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +3211%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
8
1920
Shading Units
64
120
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
70W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G92
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy