Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1620MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +59%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
16
1920
Shading Units
1024
120
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
TU117
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy